Complexion boosters have become the secret sauce in so many makeup routines, blurring, brightening, and adding dimension without actual coverage. As a beauty editor who’s constantly testing formulas, I kept seeing the same comparison over and over again: e.l.f. Halo Glow Liquid Filter versus Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter. And naturally, I had to see how they stacked up.
What They Have in Common
Both are complexion enhancers, not foundations. They have sheer coverage and are meant to add glow to the skin.
Both Can Be Worn:
- On bare skin
- Under foundation
- Mixed into the foundation
- As a liquid highlighter on high points
Common Ingredients:
- Hydrating agents like glycerin and squalane
- Lightweight emollients for slip
- Silicones for smoothing and blurring
Result: skin looks healthier, smoother, and more radiant, not sparkly.
Where They Start to Differ
Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter
Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter, focuses more on refinement. Finely milled powders help blur pores and texture, while porcelain flower extract adds subtle brightening. The finish is luminous and it gives you a candlelit glow. It also feels thinner on application, which some people prefer under makeup.
My experience wearing the Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter
I love the subtle luminosity this gives my skin. The thinner texture makes it easy to layer under makeup, but most of the time I use it as a liquid highlighter. It’s not too intense, it just gives the skin a healthy and nice glow.
Best for you if:
- You want a smooth, luminous, camera-ready glow
- You wear this under makeup often
- You like the brand and don’t mind the splurge
e.l.f. Halo Glow Liquid Filter
e.l.f. Halo Glow Liquid Filter leans a little more skincare-forward. It includes hyaluronic acid, sunflower seed oil, and calendula extract, which help boost hydration and comfort. It also comes in a wider shade range, which makes it easier to find a close match across different undertones.
My experience wearing the e.l.f. Halo Glow Liquid Filter leans
It’s thicker than the Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter. It definitely feels hydrating, but I hate the packaging, it leaks everywhere. I believe e.l.f. did update the packaging but I’m not sure.
Best for you if:
- You love a dewy, hydrated finish
- You want glow without spending luxury prices
- You prefer a more skincare-leaning formula
Which One Should You Buy?
Performance-wise, they’re very similar, so it really comes down to how much you want to spend and which brand you prefer. For me personally, I do like the Charlotte Tilbury one better. But if I wasn’t able to afford it, I would 100% buy the e.l.f. one and be happy with it (as long as it didn’t leak). The e.l.f. version is slightly more hydrating, but it’s not a drastic difference compared to Charlotte Tilbury.
At the end of the day, the main differences come down to price, finish, and experience—and you don’t need both.
Choose e.l.f. if you want value and a slightly dewier, more hydrated finish.
Choose Charlotte Tilbury if you want refined candle lit glow.

Charlotte Tilbury
Hollywood Flawless Filter

e.l.f. Halo Glow Liquid Filter, Complexion Booster
Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase through them, I may receive a small commission. This helps support the content I create—thank you!

